REPOST ARTICLE SOURCE: http://thechairmansblog.gallup.com/2012/09/dont-be-misled-by-us-unemployment-rate.html
U.S. unemployment was 8.1% in August, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Meaning, of all the people who want to work or are actively looking for a job, 8.1% don’t have one. This number gets an awful lot of media attention, particularly in an election year, but it is deeply misleading. For example, in August, relatively few jobs were added but more workers dropped out of the workforce, so the unemployment rate went down.
Most leaders and citizens probably don’t know what the unemployment number represents. I suspect most don’t even know that it’s actually a survey of 60,000 households conducted each month by the Current Population Survey on behalf of the BLS. Some think it is an actual tally of paperwork from claims. It is not — it’s an estimate drawn from monthly tracking surveys.
The problem with the unemployment metric is that an additional 6.6% report being “underemployed,” meaning they are left out of the 8.1% unemployed because they have part-time work but wish they were employed full time; they’re not classified as “unemployed.” They’re not in the 8.1% everyone’s watching, and this makes things complicated. Nearly 15% underemployed, including the unemployed, is much more accurate and significant than the single 8.1%.
Things get even more complicated. Some examples:
- If someone has lost all hope of finding a job and just stays at home deeply depressed, the government doesn’t count him as “unemployed,” because he is not actively looking. I’d assert that “hopelessly unemployed” seems as unemployed as one can get.
- If a laid-off engineer comes over and mows your yard, taking one hour of time, and you pay him, say, $20 — and that is the only hour he works that week — the government doesn’t count him as unemployed, but as underemployed. So that laid-off engineer is officially not unemployed. How does that make sense?
- When several hundred thousand workers get discouraged, the size of the U.S. workforce mathematically decreases, because fewer workers report “looking.” So even if jobs are decreasing, it will appear unemployment is improving because the denominator got smaller –driving the percent unemployed down. This is really misleading.
- And one more thing: The unemployment metric gets “seasonally adjusted,” meaning the BLS tries to mathematically correct big swings in people going in and out of the workplace by weighting the data according to things like warmer weather, vacations, back-to-school season, holidays, etc.
My big point here is that the current U.S. unemployment metric is an over-complicated mess and misleads smart American leaders and citizens. Bluntly, we don’t honestly know when we see the government’s unemployment data if the employment situation got a little better or a little worse.
Gallup has a solution and breakthrough. We will start reporting Payroll to Population employment rates (P2P) every day on our website as of today. We will use a big sample of 30,000 completed telephone interviews in the U.S. and compute a new global employment metric that will be pure and unadjusted.